Project Description
CERAFORM®
Synthetic Bone Substitute
CERAFORM® is a biocompatible and safe synthetic biphasic ceramic made of hydroxyapatite (HA) and beta tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP).
Hydroxyapatite Ca10(PO4)6(OH)2 is a calcium phosphate similar to the mineral phase of bone tissue. Tricalcium phosphate Ca3(PO4)2 , more soluble than HA, improves the resorption kinetics of CERAFORM®.
ADVANTAGES
- Biocompatible
- Synthetic
- Absorbable
- Osteoconductive
- Interconnected porosity
CERAFORM® is indicated for the filling of bone defects, due to bone injury (such as tumour, trauma, disease), or surgical procedure (such as arthrodesis, osteotomy), as follows:
• Granules are indicated for use in tumoral or benign bone cysts (shoulder, hip, knee, foot), fractures (shoulder, knee), osteotomies (knee), and spine fusion procedures,
• Sticks are indicated for use in fractures (knee, shoulder),
• Wedges are indicated for use in fractures (knee, shoulder).
Biphasic ceramic HA/TCP, the answer to bone defects.
SYNTHETIC
• Free from organic phase
• No immunological risk
ABSORBABLE
• Absorbed after an average of 2 years
BIOCOMPATIBLE
• Compliant to ISO 10993-1
References
Description | Reference |
---|---|
CERAFORM® 5 cc 3x3x3 granules | T804402 |
CERAFORM® 10 cc 3x3x3 granules | T804405 |
CERAFORM® 15 cc 3x3x3 granules | T804407 |
CERAFORM® 20 cc 3x3x3 granules | T804410 |
CERAFORM® 30 cc 3x3x3 granules | T804415 |
CERAFORM® 15 cc 6x6x6 granules | T804507 |
CERAFORM® 30 cc 6x6x6 granules | T804515 |
CERAFORM® 2.5 cc 5x5x20 sticks (qty:5) | T807104 |
CERAFORM® 8° wedge | T803008 |
CERAFORM® 10° wedge | T803010 |
CERAFORM® 12° wedge | T803012 |
Bibliography
« Aplication of a biphasic macroporous synthetic bone substitutes CERAFORM® : clinical and histological results », P. Botez, P. Sirbu, L. Simion, F. Munteanu, I. Antoniac, Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. (2009) 19 : 387-395
– « Biphasic ceramic bone subsitute mixed with autogenous bone marrow in the treatment of cavitary benign bone lesions », G. El-Adl, M. Mostafa, A. Enan, M. Ashraf, Acta Orthop. Belg., 2009, 75, 110-118
– « A Comparison of mineral bone graft substitutes for bone defects », D. Allison, A. Lindberg, B. Samimi, R. Mirzayan, L. Merendez, US Oncology & Hematology
